Showing posts with label Roundtables. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roundtables. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 12, 2017

The OMNB Roundtable: Down With the Sickness (of Marvel Franchise Fatigue)

Kyle:
Guys this one kind of hurts me, because I have been a voice crying out in the wilderness against the general rising tide of “ugh, I am soo sick of comic book movies” that has permeated reviews everywhere. A comic book is just a fucking medium to tell a story, that gets adapted into a different medium. No one ever says “uggghh I am so sick of movies based on books.” 

That said, I am worried that the very specific house style of Marvel Studios is starting to peak. I watched Guardians of the Galaxy 2 the other night and I had so looked forward to that movie, as the first is still one of my all-time favorites, and man was it just an overly forced rehash of the second, saved only slightly by a pretty decent climax and Kurt Russell.

The sad thing is I wouldn’t even say any Marvel movie I have ever watched is objectively bad (although I could be convinced that Age of Ultron sucked if I could remember any of it), but there comes a point when factory-produced B+ movies that never really take risks just become noise. Thoughts? 

Oh and maybe we should also touch on JJ Abrams getting Episode IX because I am very split on how I feel about this. 

Erik:
They've kinda backed themselves into the most comfortable corner possible. When you're pumping out 3-4 movies a year and they're all "good," that becomes your new baseline. All their movies are thoroughly acceptable, at the absolute worst, so unless something is the Winter Soldier it gets a resounding shrug from me. Great work, Marvel, you did what you've been doing every 3 months since I was in high school.

Kyle:
Oh I agree they’re still in a good spot. They’re going to make all of the money for the foreseeable future, and so it’s hard to ask what is ultimately a business to mix things up, but man am I hoping Infinity War takes some chances and shakes things up in a big way, even if, like, killing off Tony or Steve would really be because Downey and Evans are about done, and not because they actually want to take huge story risks. Guardians just kind of shook me as a guy who defended even Ant-Man and Dr. Strange for being more unique than people give them credit for. I did not expect to come out of a movie that had fucking Ego the Living Planet as the villain going “meh, that was nothing I haven’t really seen before.”

Travis:
I didn’t like Guardians 1, so hearing this means I’m not watching Guardians 2, but as to the larger issue of every other movie being a comic book movie, I’m not sure I care specifically? To elaborate, what I mean is that I don’t care about any superhero movie because I know I won’t have a shortage of them anytime soon. There are no stakes. This is also, humorously, an issue with American comics in general, though for a different reason. Back with X2 and Spider-Man 2 it really seemed like those movies could go away, so maybe this is the last adventure with these characters I’ll get to see. Now there’s just no way. Most likely DoFP was the last great one we’ll see, because it provided actual closure to a series of things we won’t get again (technically Logan is the end for those movies, but that movie… look, that’s another discussion entirely).

As far as Abrams is concerned, he was a good choice to do a shiny reboot that was competently made that set the table for all the future SW movies, but I don’t have any faith in him making a movie that exceeds his usual fare. He’s proven pretty comprehensively that his ceiling is a 3 star movie that you don’t hate but don’t ever need to see again.  
Kyle:
I just can never shake the memory of Star Trek Into Darkness. Star Trek 2009 was a fun movie full of likeable characters that had a tolerable level of plot contrivances, easter eggs, and fan service that you put up with knowing that the goal was to end the movie with a re-introduced crew blasting off for new adventures. Then the sequel did the exact thing the first movie did. It retroactively ruined its predecessor.  I have some fear that this is where IX will go, but I comfort myself with the knowledge that A) JJ is above all else a Star Wars fan, and he really cares about this story in a way he never cared about Trek and B) the Lucasfilm Story Group is undefeated so far in battling the worst impulses of directors and ensuring a good, continuous story throughout all forms of media, so they should hopefully keep JJ on track. The key here is if Rian Johnson turns The Last Jedi into something that takes us in a new enough direction that turning IX into a rehash of Return of the Jedi is not possible.

Also, Travis, to speak to your point about how “knowing the series can actually end” makes comic book movies better—this is weirdly enough why I am so happy that the DC Extended Universe appears to have failed and that after JL their plan is entirely self-contained movie franchises and even stand-alone, one-shot Elseworlds type stories. Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman is no longer needed to service a larger franchise, so Patty Jenkins is as free to tell a self-contained story that might even end in the character’s death as Christopher Nolan was. Despite everything WB is doing seemingly being a massive clusterfuck, we’ve got the potential there for some good, independent films about DC characters. James Wan being handed a blank slate and a blank check for Aquaman definitely intrigues me more than an Infinity War movie that’s still just going to set up another decade of sequels.

Travis:
Right, at this point the Marvel movies are basically just the comics, and what has always frustrated me about American comics is how impermanent they are. Artists and authors change, stories change, old stories are either canon or not depending on… well, anything, really. You get 40 issues of one guy, then another guy steps up and everything is different. Dead people come back, new people die, they come back later. The universe is always threatened, but you know it won’t end with the universe going away (unless a brand new one is going to pop up next month). To Erik’s point, it’s the security Marvel feels right now that has removed the punch from their movies. Back when I was a kid this waa all I could have asked for, and now I’m getting my just desserts.

And yeah, there are very clear through-lines in all of JJ’s work. He makes the one movie, and it’s a horrible fit for a part 3 in a trilogy.

Thursday, August 31, 2017

This Weeks OMNB Roundtable: Movie Do-Over

KYLE
So there’s not much to discuss really unless we want to rant some more about whatever the heck it is WB is doing with the DC movies but we NEED CONTENT AND CLICKS CLICKS CLICKS so I’m suggesting a fun exercise for today’s roundtable: movie do-over. If you could be given free range to remake any movie, what would you do?  You go back in time to the first day of production on a movie you felt underachieved. You have to keep the cast, budget, etc, but you can re-do the story however you’d like.

For example I’d take the exact same cast and basic story (superman origin story and fight vs Zod) of Man of Steel and just do it right by launching Zack Snyder into the sun with my trebuchet.

Second place: I could make a fucking great Green Lantern movie with Ryan Reynolds as Hal and Mark Strong as Sinestro. FUCKING GREAT.

ERIK
I'd replace Ryan with Nathan Fillion in a heartbeat. I don't have the Firefly Fanboy desire to make him play every role in every film but I mean... he's already played the character in the DCAU and also Hal Jordan is Malcolm Reynolds, But He's Superman.

KYLE
Oh Fillion could murder that role. Honestly any number of cool guys could have done it. Reynolds, Fillion, the initial rumor that the DCEU was casting Chris Pine as Hal could have worked, although nowhere near as well as his shockingly good and likeable Steve Trevor. Instagram is always trying to cast Armie Hammer as Hal and I don’t know that I’ve ever seen Armie Hammer in anything good.

ERIK
There are rumors that the Lone Ranger was actually a thoroughly acceptable film, but nobody who saw it didn't hate it before they walked in the door. I wouldn't know, I didn't see it and have no intention of doing so.

I didn't really like Ryan Reynolds for it, to be honest. I actually don't like Ryan Reynolds in like half the roles he's ever played, because he's just "Ryan Reynolds" in all of them and I hate when actors do that. He nails the confidence/arrogance line-walking part of the character, but I don't need Quipping Hal Jordan.

TRAVIS
One movie I could get back and do again, eh? This is basically just a list of disappointing movies, so I’ll try for a movie that I didn’t think was bad, but could have been much better, Furious 7. It still makes me cry at the end, but the rest of the movie has a massive shadow hanging over it due to the death of Paul Walker. The comedy falls flat, the set pieces lose a lot of their meaning because the story had to be re-written so hastily, and Bryan’s story gets stunted for obvious reasons.

KYLE
In this hypothetical are you keeping Paul Walker alive through the end of filming? I’m giving us a lot of power in these hypotheticals but if I’ve said it once I’ve said it a million times: I am never giving you the Resurrection Stone, Travis.

TRAVIS
Are we remaking the movie today? Or are we having them re-do the movie at that time? At the time I’d have given them longer to re-write the script and Tarkin’d Paul Walker and his stunt double brothers in there for the extra stuff you need.

KYLE
Re-making it at the time. You fire the director on the first day of production, you are now the director, and you’re like an untouchable director who gets to do whatever he wants without studio interference. So Paul Walker is still dying here, you’re just going to delay the premiere and give more post-production time to fix this?

I should add I want some specifics here, how would you change the plot to incorporate his death more organically? Cuz I can definitely give specifics on how I’m fixing Man of Steel.


Thursday, August 24, 2017

Star Wars Tech: Why It Isn't Unoriginal that The First Order Just Keeps Copying the Empire, a OneMoreNerdBlog Round Table


Welcome to our first OneMoreNerdBlog Roundtable (is it a roundtable if only two people are involved? Most of these will probably involve all three of us but Travis hates Star Wars so), where we will put the most brilliant minds in the universe together to tackle the most important subjects of the day. Today’s topic: people are upset about the new Star Wars movies “rehashing” the ideas/technology of the original trilogy. We disagree. Here’s why:

Kyle:
Erik, are you ready for OUTRAGE at the UNORIGINAL MORONS at DISNEY who continue to disgrace the memory of our HIGHLY ORIGINAL and now dead expanded universe, which included such VERY ORIGINAL IDEAS as A NEW EMPIRE, and a PALPATINE CLONE, and MORE SITH, and MORE JEDI?

Erik:
I have never been more ready. I mean for God's sake, how could you spit in the face of such innovations as the StealthX, an X-Wing that is black so you can't see it?

Kyle:
Because in space engagements waged thousands of kilometers apart, the primary method of identifying targets is clearly visual! It’s not like there’s a famous scene where people make a big deal about Luke turning off his targeting computer or anything.

So the big fanboy rage right now is that after The Force Awakens brought us such “retreads” as an updated X-Wing, updated TIEs and Star Destroyers, upgraded Stormtroopers etc, it appears The Last Jedi is bringing us bigger, badder AT-ATs, as well as upgraded A-Wings.

The logic, if I follow it, is that Disney needs to introduce completely new designs and aesthetics or else they are forever just a billion dollar fanfic. Your rebuttal?

ERIK:
This is the F-15 Eagle.


Image result for f-15 


This is the F-22 Raptor.

Image result for f-22


 The first Eagle designated for actual military service was delivered in 1976, and the first Raptor to achieve Initial Operating Capability did so in 2005. Nearly 30 years of cutting-edge aviation engineering resulted in basically the same fucking plane, but faster and more maneuverable. The weapons, internal systems, and all that are obviously lightyears ahead, but the physical body structure of a jet-propelled combat aircraft really didn't need to change much to accommodate those upgrades.

And remember, air combat is (relatively speaking) a new invention. 100 years ago, the Air Force was a bunch of dudes literally dropping bombs over the sides of airplanes. In the Star Wars Universe, faster-than-light travel, laser weapons, shield generators — all that has been in use for thousands of years.